SpiderOak vs Tenable One
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and integrations.
Quick Verdict
SpiderOak offers fewer features (12 vs 35) and fewer integrations (0 vs 9). Both start at Contact Sales. SpiderOak has 12 unique features while Tenable One has 35 unique features, with 0 features in common.
| SpiderOak | Tenable One | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Cybersecurity | Cybersecurity |
| Total Features | 12 | 35 |
| AI-Powered Features | 0 | 3 |
| Starting Price | Contact Sales | Contact Sales |
| Pricing Tiers | 0 | 9 |
| Integrations | 0 | 9 |
| Shared Features | 0 | |
| Shared Integrations | 0 | |
| Data Quality | 30% | 80% |
Feature Comparison by Category
AI Security (0 vs 2)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| AI Exposure | ||
| AI Security |
Analytics (0 vs 1)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| Exposure Analytics |
Asset Discovery (0 vs 2)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| Comprehensive Asset Inventory | ||
| Native Attack Surface Discovery |
Attack Surface Management (0 vs 1)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Surface Management |
Automation (0 vs 1)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| Orchestration and Remediation |
Cloud Security (0 vs 2)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| Cloud Security (CNAPP) | ||
| Cloud Vulnerability Management |
Compliance (0 vs 1)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance Checks and Audits |
Data Integration (0 vs 1)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| Exposure Data Fabric |
Deployment (0 vs 1)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-platform Deployment |
Identity Security (0 vs 2)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| Cloud IEM (Cloud Identity Entitlement Management) | ||
| Identity Exposure |
Incident Response (0 vs 1)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| Emergency Response |
Infrastructure (1 vs 0)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| Decentralized Deployment |
Integration (0 vs 1)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| Tenable One Connectors |
Network Security (0 vs 1)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| Enclave Security |
OT/IoT Security (0 vs 1)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| OT Security |
Patch Management (0 vs 1)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| Patch Management |
Professional Services (3 vs 0)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| Cyber Risk Assessments (ACTRA) | ||
| Legacy System Hardening (FORTEXS) | ||
| Secure Architecture Design (TEARA) |
Real-time Monitoring (0 vs 1)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| Live Results |
Reporting (0 vs 1)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| Customizable Reporting |
Reporting & Analytics (0 vs 1)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| Advanced Analytics and Reporting |
Risk Prioritization (0 vs 1)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| Predictive Prioritization |
Risk Scoring (0 vs 1)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| Vulnerability Scoring (CVSS v4, EPSS, VPR) |
Security (8 vs 0)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| Access Control | ||
| Data Protection | ||
| Malware Protection | ||
| Message Authentication | ||
| Programmable Policy Management | ||
| Quantum-Resilient Encryption | ||
| Spoofing Protection | ||
| Unauthorized Access Prevention |
Security Assessment (0 vs 1)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| Security Hygiene |
Templates (0 vs 1)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-built Policies and Templates |
Threat Analysis (0 vs 2)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| Dynamic Attack Path Mapping | ||
| Threat Investigation |
Threat Intelligence (0 vs 1)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| Threat and Vulnerability Intelligence |
User Interface (0 vs 1)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| Grouped View |
Vulnerability Assessment (0 vs 2)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| Tenable Nessus | ||
| Web App Scanning |
Vulnerability Management (0 vs 3)
| Feature | SpiderOak | Tenable One |
|---|---|---|
| Tenable Security Center | ||
| Tenable Vulnerability Management | ||
| Vulnerability Management |
Unique Features
Only in SpiderOak (12)
Decentralized Deployment
Cyber Risk Assessments (ACTRA)
Legacy System Hardening (FORTEXS)
Secure Architecture Design (TEARA)
Access Control
Data Protection
Malware Protection
Message Authentication
Programmable Policy Management
Quantum-Resilient Encryption
Spoofing Protection
Unauthorized Access Prevention
Only in Tenable One (35)
AI Exposure
AI Security
Exposure Analytics
Comprehensive Asset Inventory
Native Attack Surface Discovery
Attack Surface Management
Orchestration and Remediation
Cloud Security (CNAPP)
Cloud Vulnerability Management
Compliance Checks and Audits
Exposure Data Fabric
Multi-platform Deployment
Cloud IEM (Cloud Identity Entitlement Management)
Identity Exposure
Emergency Response
Tenable One Connectors
Enclave Security
OT Security
Patch Management
Live Results
+ 15 more unique features
Want to build your own alternative to SpiderOak or Tenable One?
Analyze it with Reap