Ping Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and integrations.
Quick Verdict
Ping Identity offers fewer features (15 vs 21) and fewer integrations (1 vs 12). Both start at Contact Sales. Ping Identity has 15 unique features while Microsoft Entra ID has 21 unique features, with 0 features in common.
| Ping Identity | Microsoft Entra ID | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & Access Management | Identity & Access Management |
| Total Features | 15 | 21 |
| AI-Powered Features | 1 | 3 |
| Starting Price | Contact Sales | Contact Sales |
| Pricing Tiers | 0 | 8 |
| Integrations | 1 | 12 |
| Shared Features | 0 | |
| Shared Integrations | 0 | |
| Data Quality | 40% | 75% |
Feature Comparison by Category
AI (1 vs 1)
| Feature | Ping Identity | Microsoft Entra ID |
|---|---|---|
| Helix AI | ||
| Security Copilot Integration |
Access Control (0 vs 3)
| Feature | Ping Identity | Microsoft Entra ID |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Entitlement Management | ||
| Conditional Access | ||
| Privileged Identity Management |
Authentication (0 vs 4)
| Feature | Ping Identity | Microsoft Entra ID |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) | ||
| Passwordless Authentication | ||
| Single Sign-On (SSO) | ||
| Verifiable Credentials |
Automation (2 vs 0)
| Feature | Ping Identity | Microsoft Entra ID |
|---|---|---|
| No-Code Identity Journeys | ||
| Orchestrate |
Compliance (1 vs 0)
| Feature | Ping Identity | Microsoft Entra ID |
|---|---|---|
| IAM Standards Compliance |
Core IAM (5 vs 0)
| Feature | Ping Identity | Microsoft Entra ID |
|---|---|---|
| Access | ||
| Any Identity Experience | ||
| Govern | ||
| Identify | ||
| Manage |
Governance (0 vs 1)
| Feature | Ping Identity | Microsoft Entra ID |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Access Reviews |
Identity Management (0 vs 2)
| Feature | Ping Identity | Microsoft Entra ID |
|---|---|---|
| Centralized Identity Management | ||
| Hybrid Identity Management |
Infrastructure (1 vs 0)
| Feature | Ping Identity | Microsoft Entra ID |
|---|---|---|
| Flexible Deployment Options |
Integration (2 vs 1)
| Feature | Ping Identity | Microsoft Entra ID |
|---|---|---|
| App Integrations | ||
| Multi-Connector Integration | ||
| Platform Extensibility |
Reporting (0 vs 2)
| Feature | Ping Identity | Microsoft Entra ID |
|---|---|---|
| Advanced Security Reports | ||
| Event Logging and Reporting |
Security (3 vs 3)
| Feature | Ping Identity | Microsoft Entra ID |
|---|---|---|
| Decentralized Identity | ||
| Fraud Prevention | ||
| Protect | ||
| Secure Adaptive Access | ||
| Strong Authentication | ||
| Zero Trust Approach |
Threat Detection (0 vs 2)
| Feature | Ping Identity | Microsoft Entra ID |
|---|---|---|
| Identity Protection | ||
| Risk-Based Conditional Access |
User Management (0 vs 2)
| Feature | Ping Identity | Microsoft Entra ID |
|---|---|---|
| Employee Self-Service | ||
| Self-Service Portals |
Unique Features
Only in Ping Identity (15)
Helix AI
No-Code Identity Journeys
Orchestrate
IAM Standards Compliance
Access
Any Identity Experience
Govern
Identify
Manage
Flexible Deployment Options
Multi-Connector Integration
Platform Extensibility
Decentralized Identity
Fraud Prevention
Protect
Only in Microsoft Entra ID (21)
Basic Entitlement Management
Conditional Access
Privileged Identity Management
Security Copilot Integration
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
Passwordless Authentication
Single Sign-On (SSO)
Verifiable Credentials
Basic Access Reviews
Centralized Identity Management
Hybrid Identity Management
App Integrations
Advanced Security Reports
Event Logging and Reporting
Secure Adaptive Access
Strong Authentication
Zero Trust Approach
Identity Protection
Risk-Based Conditional Access
Employee Self-Service
+ 1 more unique features
View Ping Identity details View Microsoft Entra ID details Ping Identity alternatives Microsoft Entra ID alternatives
Want to build your own alternative to Ping Identity or Microsoft Entra ID?
Analyze it with Reap