Aqua Security vs UpGuard
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and integrations.
Quick Verdict
Aqua Security offers more features (36 vs 25) and more integrations (14 vs 3). Both start at Contact Sales. Aqua Security has 36 unique features while UpGuard has 25 unique features, with 0 features in common.
| Aqua Security | UpGuard | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Cybersecurity | Cybersecurity |
| Total Features | 36 | 25 |
| AI-Powered Features | 1 | 4 |
| Starting Price | Contact Sales | Contact Sales |
| Pricing Tiers | 2 | 5 |
| Integrations | 14 | 3 |
| Shared Features | 0 | |
| Shared Integrations | 0 | |
| Data Quality | 85% | 70% |
Feature Comparison by Category
AI (0 vs 1)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| AI-Powered Detection and Prioritization |
AI Security (1 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| GenAI Application Security |
Access Control (1 vs 1)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Role-Based Access Control | ||
| Role-based access control (RBAC) |
Administration (0 vs 1)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Org Accounts |
Alerting (0 vs 1)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| News & Incidents Monitoring |
Assessment (0 vs 4)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Onboarding Questionnaire | ||
| Questionnaire Library | ||
| Vendor Security Ratings | ||
| Vendor Snapshots |
Automation (0 vs 2)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Questionnaire Builder | ||
| Risk Automations |
Cloud Security (5 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Agentless cloud workload scanning | ||
| Auto-discovery and inventory | ||
| Cloud VM Security | ||
| Configuration checks | ||
| Multi-cloud support |
Code Security (4 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Code Security | ||
| Code repo discovery and code scanning | ||
| Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) scanning | ||
| Integrity checks |
Compliance (1 vs 1)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Audit Log | ||
| Compliance reporting |
Container Orchestration (1 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Kubernetes Security |
Container Security (1 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Container Security |
Customization (0 vs 1)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Custom Co-Branding |
DevSecOps (3 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| CI/CD posture management | ||
| CI/CD, registry and SCM toolchain integrity | ||
| Pipeline security |
Human Risk (0 vs 1)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Human Risk Management / User Risk |
Integration (0 vs 1)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| API Access |
Integrations (1 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Third-party tool integrations |
Mainframe Security (1 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| IBM Z Mainframe Security |
Monitoring (2 vs 2)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous Monitoring | ||
| End-to-end visibility | ||
| Event audit trails and incidents view | ||
| Vendor Monitoring |
Network Security (1 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Service identity-based segmentation |
Organization (0 vs 1)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor Summary |
Reporting (0 vs 2)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Real-Time Posture Loop | ||
| Unified Risk Posture View |
Risk Management (3 vs 2)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Contextualized risk scoring | ||
| Fourth Parties Monitoring | ||
| Posture Management | ||
| Risk-based prioritization | ||
| Vendor Risk Management |
Runtime Protection (2 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Drift prevention | ||
| Runtime Security |
Security (0 vs 1)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Single Sign-On (SSO) |
Serverless (1 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Serverless Security |
Supply Chain Security (2 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Automated SBOM generation and analysis | ||
| Open source health scoring |
Threat Detection (4 vs 1)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Advanced malware protection | ||
| Attack Surface Management | ||
| Cloud Native Detection & Response (CNDR) | ||
| Dynamic Threat Analysis (DTA) | ||
| eBPF-based real-time detection |
Trust Management (0 vs 1)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Trust Management / Trust Exchange |
Vulnerability Management (1 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Vulnerability and risk scanning |
Vulnerability Scanning (1 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Trivy Open Source Scanner |
Workflow (0 vs 1)
| Feature | Aqua Security | UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment & Remediation Workflows |
Unique Features
Only in Aqua Security (36)
Role-based access control (RBAC)
GenAI Application Security
Agentless cloud workload scanning
Auto-discovery and inventory
Cloud VM Security
Configuration checks
Multi-cloud support
Code repo discovery and code scanning
Code Security
Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) scanning
Integrity checks
Compliance reporting
Kubernetes Security
Container Security
CI/CD posture management
CI/CD, registry and SCM toolchain integrity
Pipeline security
Third-party tool integrations
IBM Z Mainframe Security
End-to-end visibility
+ 16 more unique features
Only in UpGuard (25)
Role-Based Access Control
Multi-Org Accounts
AI-Powered Detection and Prioritization
News & Incidents Monitoring
Onboarding Questionnaire
Questionnaire Library
Vendor Security Ratings
Vendor Snapshots
Questionnaire Builder
Risk Automations
Audit Log
Custom Co-Branding
Human Risk Management / User Risk
API Access
Continuous Monitoring
Vendor Monitoring
Vendor Summary
Real-Time Posture Loop
Unified Risk Posture View
Fourth Parties Monitoring
+ 5 more unique features
Want to build your own alternative to Aqua Security or UpGuard?
Analyze it with Reap