Aqua Security vs Quantivate
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and integrations.
Quick Verdict
Aqua Security offers more features (36 vs 21) and more integrations (14 vs 0). Both start at Contact Sales. Aqua Security has 36 unique features while Quantivate has 21 unique features, with 0 features in common.
| Aqua Security | Quantivate | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Cybersecurity | Cybersecurity |
| Total Features | 36 | 21 |
| AI-Powered Features | 1 | 0 |
| Starting Price | Contact Sales | Contact Sales |
| Pricing Tiers | 2 | 0 |
| Integrations | 14 | 0 |
| Shared Features | 0 | |
| Shared Integrations | 0 | |
| Data Quality | 85% | 40% |
Feature Comparison by Category
AI Security (1 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | Quantivate |
|---|---|---|
| GenAI Application Security |
Access Control (1 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | Quantivate |
|---|---|---|
| Role-based access control (RBAC) |
Audit (0 vs 2)
| Feature | Aqua Security | Quantivate |
|---|---|---|
| Audit Management | ||
| Internal Audit |
Cloud Security (5 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | Quantivate |
|---|---|---|
| Agentless cloud workload scanning | ||
| Auto-discovery and inventory | ||
| Cloud VM Security | ||
| Configuration checks | ||
| Multi-cloud support |
Code Security (4 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | Quantivate |
|---|---|---|
| Code Security | ||
| Code repo discovery and code scanning | ||
| Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) scanning | ||
| Integrity checks |
Compliance (1 vs 2)
| Feature | Aqua Security | Quantivate |
|---|---|---|
| Complaint Management | ||
| Compliance Management | ||
| Compliance reporting |
Container Orchestration (1 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | Quantivate |
|---|---|---|
| Kubernetes Security |
Container Security (1 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | Quantivate |
|---|---|---|
| Container Security |
DevSecOps (3 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | Quantivate |
|---|---|---|
| CI/CD posture management | ||
| CI/CD, registry and SCM toolchain integrity | ||
| Pipeline security |
Document Management (0 vs 1)
| Feature | Aqua Security | Quantivate |
|---|---|---|
| Policy & Document Management |
Implementation (0 vs 1)
| Feature | Aqua Security | Quantivate |
|---|---|---|
| Fast Implementation |
Infrastructure (0 vs 2)
| Feature | Aqua Security | Quantivate |
|---|---|---|
| Flexible Data Architecture | ||
| Web-based SaaS Platform |
Integration (0 vs 1)
| Feature | Aqua Security | Quantivate |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Modules |
Integrations (1 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | Quantivate |
|---|---|---|
| Third-party tool integrations |
Issue Tracking (0 vs 1)
| Feature | Aqua Security | Quantivate |
|---|---|---|
| Issue Management |
Mainframe Security (1 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | Quantivate |
|---|---|---|
| IBM Z Mainframe Security |
Monitoring (2 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | Quantivate |
|---|---|---|
| End-to-end visibility | ||
| Event audit trails and incidents view |
Network Security (1 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | Quantivate |
|---|---|---|
| Service identity-based segmentation |
Procurement (0 vs 1)
| Feature | Aqua Security | Quantivate |
|---|---|---|
| Procurement Solution |
Risk Management (3 vs 4)
| Feature | Aqua Security | Quantivate |
|---|---|---|
| Business Continuity | ||
| Contextualized risk scoring | ||
| Enterprise Risk Management | ||
| IT Risk Management (ITRM) | ||
| Operational Resilience Management | ||
| Posture Management | ||
| Risk-based prioritization |
Runtime Protection (2 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | Quantivate |
|---|---|---|
| Drift prevention | ||
| Runtime Security |
Security (0 vs 2)
| Feature | Aqua Security | Quantivate |
|---|---|---|
| Permission-based Access Control | ||
| SOC 2 Type 2 Compliance |
Serverless (1 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | Quantivate |
|---|---|---|
| Serverless Security |
Services (0 vs 3)
| Feature | Aqua Security | Quantivate |
|---|---|---|
| Business Continuity Services | ||
| Consulting Services | ||
| ERM Services |
Supply Chain Security (2 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | Quantivate |
|---|---|---|
| Automated SBOM generation and analysis | ||
| Open source health scoring |
Threat Detection (4 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | Quantivate |
|---|---|---|
| Advanced malware protection | ||
| Cloud Native Detection & Response (CNDR) | ||
| Dynamic Threat Analysis (DTA) | ||
| eBPF-based real-time detection |
Vendor Management (0 vs 1)
| Feature | Aqua Security | Quantivate |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor Management |
Vulnerability Management (1 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | Quantivate |
|---|---|---|
| Vulnerability and risk scanning |
Vulnerability Scanning (1 vs 0)
| Feature | Aqua Security | Quantivate |
|---|---|---|
| Trivy Open Source Scanner |
Unique Features
Only in Aqua Security (36)
Role-based access control (RBAC)
GenAI Application Security
Agentless cloud workload scanning
Auto-discovery and inventory
Cloud VM Security
Configuration checks
Multi-cloud support
Code repo discovery and code scanning
Code Security
Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) scanning
Integrity checks
Compliance reporting
Kubernetes Security
Container Security
CI/CD posture management
CI/CD, registry and SCM toolchain integrity
Pipeline security
Third-party tool integrations
IBM Z Mainframe Security
End-to-end visibility
+ 16 more unique features
Only in Quantivate (21)
Audit Management
Internal Audit
Complaint Management
Compliance Management
Policy & Document Management
Fast Implementation
Flexible Data Architecture
Web-based SaaS Platform
Integrated Modules
Issue Management
Procurement Solution
Business Continuity
Enterprise Risk Management
IT Risk Management (ITRM)
Operational Resilience Management
Permission-based Access Control
SOC 2 Type 2 Compliance
Business Continuity Services
Consulting Services
ERM Services
+ 1 more unique features
View Aqua Security details View Quantivate details Aqua Security alternatives Quantivate alternatives
Want to build your own alternative to Aqua Security or Quantivate?
Analyze it with Reap