Aqua Security vs GitLab

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and integrations.

Quick Verdict

Aqua Security offers fewer features (36 vs 62) and more integrations (14 vs 7). Starting price: Aqua Security at Contact Sales vs GitLab at $15/mo. Aqua Security has 36 unique features while GitLab has 62 unique features, with 0 features in common.

Aqua SecurityGitLab
CategoryCybersecurityCybersecurity
Total Features3662
AI-Powered Features114
Starting PriceContact Sales$15/mo
Pricing Tiers26
Integrations147
Shared Features0
Shared Integrations0
Data Quality85%90%

Feature Comparison by Category

AI (0 vs 14)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
AI Catalog
AI Chat in the IDE
AI Code Suggestions in the IDE
Agentic Chat
Automated Flows
Custom Agents
Custom Flows
External Agents
Foundational Agents & Flows
GitLab Duo Agent Platform
GitLab Duo Enterprise
GitLab Duo Pro
Model Context Protocol Integrations
Model Selection

AI Security (1 vs 0)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
GenAI Application Security

Access Control (1 vs 1)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
Guest Users
Role-based access control (RBAC)

Analytics (0 vs 5)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
Code and Productivity Analytics
Contributor Analytics
DORA4 Metrics
Insights and Health Reporting
Value Stream Management

Cloud Security (5 vs 0)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
Agentless cloud workload scanning
Auto-discovery and inventory
Cloud VM Security
Configuration checks
Multi-cloud support

Code Review (0 vs 2)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
Code Quality Reports
Multiple Approvers in Code Review

Code Security (4 vs 0)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
Code Security
Code repo discovery and code scanning
Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) scanning
Integrity checks

Communication (0 vs 1)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
Status Page

Compliance (1 vs 3)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
Audit Events
Compliance Dashboards
Compliance Frameworks
Compliance reporting

Container Orchestration (1 vs 0)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
Kubernetes Security

Container Security (1 vs 0)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
Container Security

Core (0 vs 1)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
Source Code Management

Deployment (0 vs 1)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
GitLab Pages

DevOps (0 vs 3)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
Advanced CI/CD
Built-in CI/CD
Compute Minutes

DevSecOps (3 vs 0)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
CI/CD posture management
CI/CD, registry and SCM toolchain integrity
Pipeline security

Development (0 vs 1)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
Remote Development Workspaces

Governance (0 vs 1)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
Push Rules

Infrastructure (0 vs 1)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
Storage

Integration (0 vs 2)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
Jira Development Panel Integration
Remote Repository Pull Mirroring

Integrations (1 vs 0)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
Third-party tool integrations

Mainframe Security (1 vs 0)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
IBM Z Mainframe Security

Monitoring (2 vs 0)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
End-to-end visibility
Event audit trails and incidents view

Network Security (1 vs 0)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
Service identity-based segmentation

Project Management (0 vs 12)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
Enterprise Agile Planning
Enterprise Agile Planning Seats
Escalation Policies
Issue Weights
Issue to Epic Promotion
Planning Hierarchy
Portfolio Management
Project Management
SLA Countdown Timer
SLA Management
Time Tracking
Wiki-based Project Documentation

Risk Management (3 vs 0)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
Contextualized risk scoring
Posture Management
Risk-based prioritization

Runtime Protection (2 vs 0)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
Drift prevention
Runtime Security

Security (0 vs 11)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
Container Scanning
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Fuzz Testing
Infrastructure as Code (IaC) Scanning
Protected Environments
Secret Detection
Security Dashboards
Security Policies
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Vulnerability Management

Serverless (1 vs 0)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
Serverless Security

Supply Chain Security (2 vs 0)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
Automated SBOM generation and analysis
Open source health scoring

Support (0 vs 1)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
Priority Support

Testing (0 vs 1)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
Create Test Cases from Within GitLab

Threat Detection (4 vs 0)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
Advanced malware protection
Cloud Native Detection & Response (CNDR)
Dynamic Threat Analysis (DTA)
eBPF-based real-time detection

Vulnerability Management (1 vs 0)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
Vulnerability and risk scanning

Vulnerability Scanning (1 vs 0)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
Trivy Open Source Scanner

Workflow (0 vs 1)

FeatureAqua SecurityGitLab
Merge Request Guardrails

Unique Features

Only in Aqua Security (36)

Role-based access control (RBAC)
GenAI Application Security
Agentless cloud workload scanning
Auto-discovery and inventory
Cloud VM Security
Configuration checks
Multi-cloud support
Code repo discovery and code scanning
Code Security
Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) scanning
Integrity checks
Compliance reporting
Kubernetes Security
Container Security
CI/CD posture management
CI/CD, registry and SCM toolchain integrity
Pipeline security
Third-party tool integrations
IBM Z Mainframe Security
End-to-end visibility

+ 16 more unique features

Only in GitLab (62)

Guest Users
Agentic Chat
AI Catalog
AI Chat in the IDE
AI Code Suggestions in the IDE
Automated Flows
Custom Agents
Custom Flows
External Agents
Foundational Agents & Flows
GitLab Duo Agent Platform
GitLab Duo Enterprise
GitLab Duo Pro
Model Context Protocol Integrations
Model Selection
Code and Productivity Analytics
Contributor Analytics
DORA4 Metrics
Insights and Health Reporting
Value Stream Management

+ 42 more unique features

Want to build your own alternative to Aqua Security or GitLab?

Analyze it with Reap